index

Talks — Index

Quick-reference table for the six working archetypes in talks/archetypes/. Each archetype is a complete run-of-show designed for a specific combination of audience, duration, analytical spine, and region emphasis.

Archetypes

#TitleSpineAudienceDurationRegion emphasisDepth
01What’s actually deployedvendor-sweepmixed public, students45 minGlobal, with Canadian anchor (Japan/Korea vendor-deployments integrated)literate
02Who’s your data working fordata-sovereigntyfarmer co-ops, mixed public (Canada)45 minCanada (Ontario-anchored), with EU-NL comparison and Japan/India state-DPI cross-reference; Chile-Canada cross-border seed-AI cluster pattern (added July 19 2026)working
03Canada lags and that’s the storyadoption-diagnosispolicy, leadership20 minCanada (national), with Korea 30%-by-2027 + Japan WAGRI peer-country comparisonspecialist
04The cooperative alternativecooperative-alternativepolicy, cooperative, academic60 minEU-NL + EU-FR + US, with Japan + Korea state-stewarded substrates + LAC multilateral-institutional convening layer (IICA + IDB + CAF)specialist
05Critical lens: Indigenous sovereignty and the structural critiquecritical-lensacademic, policy60 minGlobal, with Peru / Canada / Aotearoa operational anchors (East-Asia state-DPI IDSov-limits layer integrated; LAC Monsalve-Suárez / Seufert / FIAN “Big Tech Takeover” critical voice as the Latin American analog)specialist
06How countries shape their agrifood AI cluster: a regional comparisonregional-cluster-comparison (new — added July 2026 alongside the Japan+Korea cycle; LAC multilateral-institutional substrate layer added July 19 2026 alongside the LAC deepening cycle)academic, policy, comparative-political-economy60 minAll seven regions — NA, EU, China, India, Japan, Korea, LAC — with explicit cross-regional comparisonspecialist

How to choose

If you’re not sure which to start from, work through this decision tree:

  1. Is the audience Canadian and farmer-facing? → 02 (data sovereignty) or 03 (adoption diagnosis).
  2. Is the audience non-specialist and you need to introduce the field? → 01 (vendor sweep).
  3. Is the audience policy or sector-insider and the talk is short? → 03 (adoption diagnosis).
  4. Is the audience policy / cooperative / academic and the talk is about alternatives? → 04 (cooperative alternative).
  5. Is the audience academic / policy and the talk is about the structural critique? → 05 (critical lens).
  6. Is the audience academic / comparative-political-economy and the talk is about cross-regional cluster patterns? → 06 (regional-cluster-comparison).

What each archetype contains

Each archetype file includes:

Status

Six archetypes as of mid-July 2026 (five load-bearing + one meta-pattern archetype added with the Japan+Korea cycle). The cluster-pattern observation has matured across six regional deepening cycles into a canonical cluster-pattern vocabulary in talks/cluster-pattern-taxonomy.md; archetype 06 draws on it.

Cycle history (older cycle annotations archived to talks/cycle-history-archive.md for compactness):

Methodology revision July 19 2026: promoted cluster-pattern vocabulary out of archetype 06 into a standalone cluster-pattern-taxonomy doc; refreshed README + index + VISION status reflection; added cross-archetype 01 / 04 / 05 cross-refs to Argentine beef / Brazilian seed / MENA / Spanish cooperatives / Mondragón (see current commit history for details).

Spines not yet covered (suggested for next iteration as corpus grows):

When one of these becomes a load-bearing talk, it gets an archetype.